This month the rarest of beasts, the inventive telco, has made an unprecedented appearance. At the time it also became apparent that the industry is in a transition phase. But mind you; it is not the transition of separating network access and voice service is that we are here to witness, but the migration from network businesses into law firms and lobbying circles. What has happened?
Germany's watchdog Bundesnetzagentur für Elektrizität, Gas, Telekommunikation, Post und Eisenbahnen (BNA former RegTP) acknowledged the existence of a closed-door working group to debate guidelines for interconnecting IP based networks. Puzzling at first the immediate questions springing to mind are:
- IP based networks are already interconnected. Why discuss a new interconnection regime for something which is already there?
- Why has BNA not heard of IP interconnects?
- Why is the perfectly valid and more pressing question of how to interconnect IP based services tied to interconnecting networks?
- And why does BNA not even consider to look into interconnecting services?
The answers to all those questions are as bad as it can possibly get.
Network lobbyists have successfully promoted an upside-down approach with BNA's president Matthias Kurth. Based on the idea that tomorrows NGN / IMS solutions will carry internet access as a
service (Yikes!) BNA needs to move the interconnection regime from PSTN interconnects to NGN interconnects they argue. Inherent to this approach is the impact on todays regime for reciprocal compensation. Rather than making the long overdue move from a calling-party-pays model to a bill-and-keep regime as even mandated from U.S. carrier big wigs (
PDF) Germany's networks are aiming to get it all.
The rationale behind this move is to determine the
cost of efficient service provision as required by Germany's
Telecommunications Act as the base for compensation. The potential outcome: Voice services that also provide internet access will receive compensation for terminating calls on top of IP traffic already billed to their customers - everyone else receives zip.
Finally, the first "useful" application for NGN / IMS has surfaced: Being an obstacle in legal proceedings. But do not be fooled; major technical and marketing issues such as those
expressed by Martin Geddes will not go away.
Asking the regulator to set up a parallel biosphere for network operators who are unwilling and incapable of adapting to the real world is as pointless as the car industry asking the goverment to make accidents illegal - only because it would be nicer. But it perfectly shows the confusion in the industry to an extent which leaves me speechless.
Come on everybody! Sing along some soothing words:
I seh, O little - O little darlin', don't shed no fears;
No, bellhead, no cry, eh...